Members Area
    
 
   

CIVIL LAW

Trade Marks

 Select Topic
 
 Related Topics
Feedback/Reviews/Blogs


ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT TRADE MARKS

You must visit our site entitled  Intellectual Property for a full overview of that subject which includes all the law on intellectual property.

We repeat the following information in that site.

A new Act was passed recently known as the Trade Marks Act 2002.  It came into force on 20 August 2003

We provide you with a direct link below to both the Press Release dated 22 November 2002 as well as to the Act itself.  You can access each of the Sections of the Act :

Press Release :

 

.  .  .  Press Release November 2002

 

We also provide you with a direct link to the Government legislation site where you can look up ALL Acts of Parliament and Regulations and Rules. An Act is also known as a Statute. A Regulation is also sometimes known as a Rule. This Government legislation site is still going through some teething problems. But you will be able to access all legislation and find specific Acts and Rules and individual sections.

Statutes
Statutory Regulations
Local & Private Acts

The above new Act is a complete overhaul.  It has been suggested that we have been well behind other countries in our trademark laws.   However, our new law does not mesh in well with the Australian law so care has to be taken in recognising the differences.

Procedures are now a lot simpler than previously and costs will be reduced.<

.....The first part of this topic has been displayed free of charge. Join up for $45 to have access to this and all other topics!


Feedback/Reviews/Blogs
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Alternative Dispute Resolution
"Membership No 186685
I have been unable to acquire any case law in regards to bankruptcy. I am thge alleged defendant in the matter and have opposed the application for bankruptcy as I am not the defendant. The case is now at the stage of the high court requiring a synopsis under 251a, I wish to make submissions in not being notified of the hearing at the district court after the notice of proceeding was served. The matter then got judgement without my knowledge and is now before the high court for bankruptcy. Please advise the procedure to locate any supportive case law that may assist with my application to set aside the bankrupcy claim.

Kindest Regards
A.Marsh
I "

"You will certainly get a rehearing if you were not notified but, if you simply misread the documents you were originally served with then you could be in trouble. You must actively follow up on your obligation to file and serve a defence and not just wait for the Court to come to you. Good luck . . . Netlaw "
"Likewise . . . very helpful. Thanks. Gerald - May 2007 - Tauranga"
"Received notice from a creditors lawyer that they wish to put in companiy into liquidation and I have up to today upon receiving their letter. A Statory Demand was intially sent on 7 Aril 2008, which I reponded with a reply explaining that an arrangement (verbal) had been entered in by both parties which was to continue supply, once company got post dated cheques, company stopped surpply and but still continued to present cheques which was not the agreement which was entred into.
What position does that leave me if I want to legal challenge this. Without causing me excessive expresses.

Rina

Netlaw responds: If you say that they cannot properly sue because there was a new agreement for time payment, then you can apply for an injunction saying that the Statutory Demand Notice is wrong. But it will cost you. An injunction should not be done without legal advice. Type up a Statement setting out precisiely all the facts as you know them and see a lawyer as soon as possible. A letter shouid be sent to the other side saying how inappropriate the Demand procedure is when the subsequent agreement between the parties was made and kept by you. But you must get your facts right!"

Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Alternative Dispute Resolution
"I found this interesting. I want to sue for punitive damages and I was interested to learn that our courts are pretty conservative. I think the Welfare have quite wrongly taken my kids and I have found out that the affidavit they gave to a Judge to get an order to uplift them was known to the Welfare to be incorrect. They told the Judge that I had drug convictions but when I found out 5 months ago that they thought that I proved then to them that this was untrue yet I have now found that they have still put this false evidence in an affidavit. But they have also told other people about my "drug convictions". You have to watch these people. (name witheld) - May 2007"
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Alternative Dispute Resolution
"You provide all the documents. Thank you. - Brett -Auckland"
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Alternative Dispute Resolution
"Coverage is very good. I would appreciate a bit more detail on expiry dates for Copyright. Genna T.
BOP.

Netlaw replies - Will do."

 Select Topic
 
 Related Topics