Members Area
    
 
   

CIVIL LAW

Real Estate Agents Act 2008

 Select Topic
 
 Related Topics
Feedback/Reviews/Blogs


This topic will give you a great deal of information about the Real Estate Agents Act 2008.

PRESS RELEASE - November 17 2009

"Wellington, Nov 16 NZPA - Real estate agents will be under a thicker magnifying glass as the newly established Real Estate Agents Authority begins operations tomorrow.

Among the many changes, the REAA will allow property buyers and sellers to look up industry licensees on a public register. The system will outline when they were first licensed, or whether they've had any disciplinary action against them in the last three years.

All are designed "to promote public confidence in the industry," said Kristy McDonald QC, chairwoman of the REAA.

The REAA is a crown entity regulating real estate agents, branch managers and salespersons under the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 and takes over from the Real Estate Institute of New Zealand as the regulatory body of the industry.

REINZ, which will now become a membership service, welcomes the new Act and sees it as a positive move, said national president Peter McDonald.

"It's an opportunity for the real estate industry to lift its public perception."

The Act was introduced by Labour MP Clayton Cosgrove as the associate minister of justice last year and was one of the last pieces of legislation passed by the previous government.

Mr Cosgrove said the new Act "aims to promote and protect the interests of consumers in real estate transactions by raising industry standards, improving licensing requirements and procedures and providing mandatory disclosure obligations".

The change was made over concerns that the previous regime was self-regulatory, said Ms McDonald.

"There wasn't an independent complaints and disciplinary process. There was concern about a lack of information for consumers and inadequate mechanism to raise industry standards.

"The Real Estate Agents Authority will provide independent oversight of the real estate industry," she said.

Under the new authority, agents, branch managers and salespersons are required to be licensed individually.

Anyone who holds a licence, prior to November 17, will be deemed to be licensed under the new Act until their licence expires.

The REAA will also be responsible for

.....The first part of this topic has been displayed free of charge. Join up for $45 to have access to this and all other topics!


Feedback/Reviews/Blogs
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Acts Of Parliament
"Membership No 186685
I have been unable to acquire any case law in regards to bankruptcy. I am thge alleged defendant in the matter and have opposed the application for bankruptcy as I am not the defendant. The case is now at the stage of the high court requiring a synopsis under 251a, I wish to make submissions in not being notified of the hearing at the district court after the notice of proceeding was served. The matter then got judgement without my knowledge and is now before the high court for bankruptcy. Please advise the procedure to locate any supportive case law that may assist with my application to set aside the bankrupcy claim.

Kindest Regards
A.Marsh
I "

"You will certainly get a rehearing if you were not notified but, if you simply misread the documents you were originally served with then you could be in trouble. You must actively follow up on your obligation to file and serve a defence and not just wait for the Court to come to you. Good luck . . . Netlaw "
"Likewise . . . very helpful. Thanks. Gerald - May 2007 - Tauranga"
"Received notice from a creditors lawyer that they wish to put in companiy into liquidation and I have up to today upon receiving their letter. A Statory Demand was intially sent on 7 Aril 2008, which I reponded with a reply explaining that an arrangement (verbal) had been entered in by both parties which was to continue supply, once company got post dated cheques, company stopped surpply and but still continued to present cheques which was not the agreement which was entred into.
What position does that leave me if I want to legal challenge this. Without causing me excessive expresses.

Rina

Netlaw responds: If you say that they cannot properly sue because there was a new agreement for time payment, then you can apply for an injunction saying that the Statutory Demand Notice is wrong. But it will cost you. An injunction should not be done without legal advice. Type up a Statement setting out precisiely all the facts as you know them and see a lawyer as soon as possible. A letter shouid be sent to the other side saying how inappropriate the Demand procedure is when the subsequent agreement between the parties was made and kept by you. But you must get your facts right!"

Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Acts Of Parliament
"I liked you Civil Index. Not much need for family or criminal but you civil index is very good to have at my fingertips. Thanks for providing this service T. (name withheld)"
"Great assistance. I agree with the above. Your civil topics are great. Better than we get at Polytech where I am studying Business Law. Terry -Dunedin - June 2007"
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Acts Of Parliament
"I am a retired Solicitor from Kent in England and the $45 I spent on your site was really helpful because I am intending settling in New Zealand and your "one stop shop" was a real boon to me. Thanks again. Arnold T. Devon, England"
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Acts Of Parliament
"I'm making an enquiry on behalf of a relative who is paying child support for a person who is in his mid 30s now, the inland revenue who he is making these payments to told me it is not child support it is spouse support payments and he needs to go back to court to have the order changed. Who do we call now as he is not on a good income and should qualify for legal aid.

Netlaw replies: Yes, Spousal Maintenance is different from Child Support. The Family Court deals with Spousal maintenance but the IRD (Child Support Division) deals with kid's maintenance. Choose any family court lawyer and if he earns less than about $33,000 he should get legal aid."

 Select Topic
 
 Related Topics