Members Area
    
 
   

CRIMINAL LAW

Parties to Offences - Aiding and Abetting

 Select Topic
 
 Related Topics
Feedback/Reviews/Blogs


Being a party to an offence or a crime is often referred to as aiding and abetting.

We think it is absolutely essential,  particularly if you are young,  to understand clearly how vulnerable you may be if you are simply with other people who commit crimes or offences.   You can get dragged in if you are not careful.

So read Section 66 carefully at the bottom of this page.

You could very well be criminally liable,  and even sent to prison,  for being a party to another person’s offending,  even if you did not think you were doing anything wrong.

If you get involved in some way then you are at real risk of being a party to an offence or crime committed by another person

The law is not unfair but the younger you are the more care you have to take not to be "sucked in"  by the criminal actions of another person.

There are obvious cases where a person who does not actually commit the crime is still clearly criminally guilty for aiding and assisting.

If your friend breaks into a house and steals things  (this is known as burglary),  but you only act as a look out ready to warn him if the police come,  then the law will find you just as guilty of the burglary as your friend.

We hope that this is obvious to you.

But there are a number of other perhaps more difficult fact situations which you might not realise could well lead you to getting into serious trouble.

The law of in relation to being are "party" to a crime is set out in section 66 of the Crimes Act 1961.  We set out the full wording of that section below.

You should read both section 66(1) and 66(2) very carefully because both subsections deal with different fact situations.

Subsection 1 effectively deals with actually assisting somebody else to commit a crime.  But be careful,  because the Courts have held sometimes that simply giving  weight in numbers by standing around a fight or an assault,  could amount to you being a party to the actual assault.   It depends on the circumstances.

It is usually said that  'mere presence'  is not enough to be a party at an offence BUT we advise that you do not take the risk

Subsection 2 deals with the situation where you can be stuck with a criminal offence committed by someone else when you did not think that they were going to commit such events.

A clear example is this :  If you and a friend decided to rob a bank .....The first part of this topic has been displayed free of charge. Join up for $45 to have access to this and all other topics!


Feedback/Reviews/Blogs
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Arms Act 1983
"I find this topic really helpful as well as all the topics under the "Weekend Arrest" topic. This is the sort of basic informatin which needs to be taught in schools. Don't you agree?"
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Arms Act 1983
"Can a woman aged 54 with a 16 year old child who is neither attending school or any other form of education/training continue to claim the DPB and child support indefinitely or should the child be on a separate independant benefit? and what if the child does not claim a benefit, does this justify the mothers ongoing DPB claim? - Jenny

Netlaw replies - Yes . . . . You go on to what is called a "Woman Alone" Benefit designed to allow the single parent to continue to be supported when the kids become independent. You need to discuss your circumstances with WINZ. The child may be entitled to an Independent Youth benefit, but they are not automatic. Special circumstances need to apply. Play around on the WINZ Website. Just type winz website into Google or your internet explorer.

Here is a quote from the WINZ Website. -

"To get a Domestic Purposes Benefit you'll need to be a sole parent, or a caregiver of someone sick or infirm, or a woman alone of 50 years of age or older. You must:

be a New Zealand citizen or permanent resident
have lived in New Zealand continuously for two years or more at any one time since becoming a New Zealand citizen or permanent resident (except refugees with permanent residence)
normally live in New Zealand".

Cheers . . . Netlaw



"

Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Arms Act 1983
"I was looking round Google to find something about representing myself and I found this and a number of your topics SPOT ON. Thanks. This one was great! Jon F. Auckland - May 2007"
"Thanks Netlaw. Rolf - Auckland"
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Arms Act 1983
"Is it possible to get a discharge without conviction on a dangerous driving or reckless driving charge? Thanks

Netlaw replies: Yes, it is possible, but very difficult. There would have to be very special reasons like driving in an emergency situation."

Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Arms Act 1983
"Has the law now changed? You used to be able to apply for a disqualification removal after 6 months of any disqualification. Dave H. - Albany

NETLAW replies: Yes. That ability has now gone. You need to read this topic carefully and note that there has been a law change,"

Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Arms Act 1983
"I found all your criminal law topics fascinating. I may become a criminal myself just to use your site. Nah, only joking but I liked Self Defence, Citizens Arrest and Drink Driving and Demerit Points.

Henk - Waikato"

Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Arms Act 1983
"Great to find all this information at my fingertips.
I think that Home Detention is a bit of a sop. Either you go to prison or you do not! I think it is almost like getting off! Mike H - Wellington"

Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Arms Act 1983
"WOW . . . a great site. This topic alone is worth the entry fee. I also did my own will and had it checked by a lawyer neighbour and he said it was perfectly OK. Matt G."
"I agree heaps. I actually followed this topic to the letter and got my limited licencemyself. It took a couple of weeks but reckon it could be done in a week. Everything you said happened. The cops were good and the judge was very nice. I only had to mumble "thank you". Noel G.
"

"Received phone call from the police today, they have told me they will NOT oppose anything set out in my limited licence application. They were very impressed that I had done all the work myself. Thanks NETLaw - Jake, Christchurch.

Netlaw replies: Thank you for teling us. We have had a similar letter from Auckland Central."

Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Arms Act 1983
"David Bain is innocent - Miriam C - Auckland"
"No he bloody ain't - Jimmy - Timaru "
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Arms Act 1983
"Dear Netlaw . . . it was really helpful to realise the difficultes in getting suppression of name and to get some of the caselaw. It allowed me to prepare a lot better. I had a silly shoplifting case but I am in my early thirties and I really wanted name suppression. You guys really helped. Also, you other sites are dazzling. Becs (not my real name)

"

Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: Arms Act 1983
"I was looking round Google to find something about representing myself and I found this and a number of your topics SPOT ON. Thanks. This one was great! Jon F. Auckland - May 2007"
 Select Topic
 
 Related Topics