Members Area
    
 
   

CIVIL LAW

Judicial Review

 Select Topic
 
 Related Topics
Feedback/Reviews/Blogs


Can the High Court control the wrongful exercise of power?

Yes  .  .  .  but with some important restrictions.

A Judicial Review is a legal review by a Judge of the High Court  (not the District Court) of a decision or a decision making process in order to make a finding whether that decision or the action taken under that decision is authorised in law or invalid for some other ground.

We wish to make it clear from the outset that the High Court cannot be used simply to argue that the decision of a statutory body or a bureaucrat is wrong.

Politicians are entitled to make wrong decisions. What they are not entitled to do is carry out a process of reasoning or a hearing which is wrong or invalid.

For centuries, the Courts have had the power or the jurisdiction to review decisions of public bodies and organisations under what was known as the Prerogative Writs.

The procedure or rules in relation to these Writs were extremely difficult and complex. The Judicature Amendment Act 1972 was specifically passed to simplify the procedure to be followed.

At its core, judicial review is a central safeguard of the rule of law, protecting citizens from unlawful interference by those who exercise – or purport to exercise – Government powers. It is also increasingly deployed in commercial contexts: public sector tenders, allocation of licences and quotas, and regulation of commercial activity. It is perhaps no surprise that a field of law which is based on some very fundamental – but also very general – principles, and which operates across a vast canvas of public decision-making, should have uncertain boundaries.

The exercise of non-statutory powers still remain reviewable under the old Prerogative Writs.

However, any exercise of a statutory power is now the subject of a simplified Judicial Review Application under the 1972 Amendment Act.  More importantly, you should look at Rule 628 of the High Court Rules.

Direct Link to High Court Rules.  Please NOTE that the link below will take you to the Judicature Act 1908 and you will then need to scroll down to the end of the Act and click on to the 2nd Schedule to get ALL of the Rules.

 

<

.....The first part of this topic has been displayed free of charge. Join up for $45 to have access to this and all other topics!


Feedback/Reviews/Blogs
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: ACC
"Hi to Netlaw. I found this a useful overview. I went to the ACC website and found it too difficult to follow. Jim (Dunedin)

"

Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: ACC
"A helpful site. Explained well. Marty - Timaru - January 2007"
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: ACC
"I liked you Civil Index. Not much need for family or criminal but you civil index is very good to have at my fingertips. Thanks for providing this service T. (name withheld)"
"Great assistance. I agree with the above. Your civil topics are great. Better than we get at Polytech where I am studying Business Law. Terry -Dunedin - June 2007"
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: ACC
"I am a retired Solicitor from Kent in England and the $45 I spent on your site was really helpful because I am intending settling in New Zealand and your "one stop shop" was a real boon to me. Thanks again. Arnold T. Devon, England"
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: ACC
"I found this interesting. I want to sue for punitive damages and I was interested to learn that our courts are pretty conservative. I think the Welfare have quite wrongly taken my kids and I have found out that the affidavit they gave to a Judge to get an order to uplift them was known to the Welfare to be incorrect. They told the Judge that I had drug convictions but when I found out 5 months ago that they thought that I proved then to them that this was untrue yet I have now found that they have still put this false evidence in an affidavit. But they have also told other people about my "drug convictions". You have to watch these people. (name witheld) - May 2007"
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: ACC
"Great coverage. Keep updating the whole website, Netlaw. Barbara K - Hamilton"
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: ACC
"I got so much from this site. You are right. It is better to "upskill" myself first before paying megabucks to a lawyer just to get an opinion.

I liked access to the case law and the real life submissions. Tim Shadbolt's case was a dag. How much did he get? Bud. Auckland"

Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: ACC
"Never knew what this meant. Now I do. Needs to be read with your other civil topics on suing people etc. Pete A - Whakatane - May 2007"
Feedback/Blogs/Reviews from related topic: ACC
"Great. See the other topics on Statement of Claim -Some Examples - Graeme - Tauranga"
 Select Topic
 
 Related Topics